At least one accuracy figure is not specified. Point distance is not an accuracy measurement.
Source-verified head-to-head
MIRACO vs EINSTAR VEGA
Which one should you buy? Start with the job and capture workflow, then use the specification table to confirm the fit. No hands-on test is claimed.
Article updated · Specification check dates are shown separately below
VS
CHOOSE MIRACO FOR
ORNear and far capture with on-device review
MIRACO suits a self-contained workflow using near or far cameras and single-frame or continuous capture. Test its grip, processing and project transfer on the objects you routinely handle.
Check latest priceDirect link to Revopoint; no affiliate tracking is active.Read the full MIRACO review →CHOOSE EINSTAR VEGA FOR
Lighter standalone HD and wide-area capture
VEGA suits buyers who value lower handheld weight and separate HD and Fast modes for detailed and larger subjects. Check tracking, on-device processing and downstream transfer on the same representative job.
Check latest priceDirect link to SHINING 3D; no affiliate tracking is active.Read the full EINSTAR VEGA review →Editorial analysis
The difference buyers actually feel
MIRACO and EINSTAR VEGA are direct all-in-one alternatives for buyers who want to capture, review and process without carrying a computer. Both use infrared rather than blue laser and both provide near-detail and wider-coverage workflows, but they divide the job differently through their optics, onboard software and price position.
MIRACO is the lower-priced standalone option in the current database, with near and far depth cameras, a 48 MP color camera and up to two hours of claimed battery life. VEGA is lighter and combines a detailed HD mode with a faster wide-area mode. Neither headline replaces a representative scan of the surfaces and object sizes you actually handle.
Decision matrix
Which workflow favors which scanner?
Match the minimum object size and close-range capture mode.
Wide-area tracking and working distance matter more here.
Prioritizes edges, surface adaptability and part workflow.
Both capture quality and mesh cleanup determine usefulness.
Standalone processing or wireless capture reduces field equipment.
Based on recorded price guides, not live checkout totals. Confirm region, tax and bundle contents.
Workflow comparison
From setup to export
Compare what changes during a real job, not only what appears in the specification table.
Field setup
MIRACO
MIRACO combines a six-inch display, onboard storage, battery power and near/far cameras in one 750 g unit.
EINSTAR VEGA
Both remove the tethered workstation; confirm the exact edition and compare grip, screen visibility, battery behavior and project transfer in person.VEGA packages a 6.4-inch display, onboard processing and two infrared projection systems. The official specification distinguishes a 535 g regular edition and a 643 g limited edition.
Small and detailed objects
MIRACO
MIRACO uses its near camera mode and can capture single frames when a continuous path is difficult.
EINSTAR VEGA
Ask both scanners to capture the same small feature and inspect raw coverage before smoothing.VEGA uses its smaller-field HD mode for finer sampling, trading coverage for detail.
People and larger objects
MIRACO
MIRACO's far cameras broaden the field of view while retaining the same self-contained workflow.
EINSTAR VEGA
Compare tracking recovery, accumulated alignment and total frames on a complete representative object.VEGA's Fast mode uses its wider infrared system for quicker coverage of larger forms and creative subjects.
Processing and transfer
MIRACO
MIRACO can fuse, mesh and review on-device, then transfer projects into the Revopoint software workflow.
EINSTAR VEGA
Choose the software process your team can repeat, not the scanner with the most attractive demo mesh.VEGA can also process on-device and move dense work to SHINING 3D desktop software when useful.
Manufacturer specifications
Side-by-side
FeatureMIRACOEINSTAR VEGA
Price guideObserved from $1,499; pricing changesTypical list price around $1,999
Claimed accuracyUp to 0.05 mmNot specified; 0.05 mm minimum point distance
Claimed resolutionUp to 0.05 mm point distanceHD: 0.05–3 mm; Fast: 0.5–10 mm point distance
Claimed scan speedUp to 15 fpsHD: up to 15 fps; Fast: up to 20 fps
Claimed working distance100–1000 mmHD: 100–350 mm; Fast: 270–1500 mm
Claimed object range10 mm to 4 m objects10 mm to large objects
Claimed light sourceQuad-camera infrared structured lightInfrared MEMS + VCSEL
Claimed markerlessYesYes
Claimed wirelessYesYes
Claimed standaloneYesYes
Claimed weight750 g535 g regular / 643 g limited edition
Claimed systemsStandalone; Windows/macOS transferStandalone; Windows/macOS software
Claimed exportsSTL, OBJ, PLYSTL, OBJ, PLY, ASC — On-device meshes: STL, OBJ, PLY; no-texture projects: STL only. ASC point clouds require StarVision on a computer
Specifications are manufacturer claims checked against the sources above. Optical modes and test conditions may differ, so similar-looking numbers are not automatically equivalent.
Best fit
MIRACO
MIRACO suits a self-contained workflow using near or far cameras and single-frame or continuous capture. Test its grip, processing and project transfer on the objects you routinely handle.
MAIN LIMITATIONBlue-laser scanning of shiny mechanical parts
Best fit
EINSTAR VEGA
VEGA suits buyers who value lower handheld weight and separate HD and Fast modes for detailed and larger subjects. Check tracking, on-device processing and downstream transfer on the same representative job.
MAIN LIMITATIONBlue-laser scanning of shiny metal
Cost of ownership
Budget for the complete scanning system
The current database places MIRACO below VEGA on entry price, but regional bundles, memory variants and promotions can change the gap. Compare equivalent storage, accessories, service and return terms rather than one promotional number.
Both systems avoid a required capture laptop, yet neither removes downstream costs. Reverse-engineering work still needs CAD reconstruction and verification; color or creative work still needs cleanup, texture review, storage and export testing. Difficult shiny mechanical surfaces may justify a separate blue-laser scanner instead of either all-in-one model.
Pre-purchase test
Four checks before paying
Use both ends of the object range
Scan one small detailed object and one larger subject. A single tabletop demo does not prove the near and far workflows are equally useful.
Force a tracking recovery
Pause or deliberately revisit known geometry, then inspect whether recovery creates duplicated edges or shifted surfaces.
Process on the scanner
Complete fusion, meshing and export without a computer, then reopen the file on the destination workstation to verify scale, orientation and texture.
Compare the complete quote
Include memory configuration, accessories, warranty, local support, tax and the software needed after mesh export.
Requirements check
Need a decision on your actual object?
Share the material, size, required output, budget and purchase timeline. We will respond with a source-linked shortlist and the main workflow risks.
Questions answered
Before you choose
Should I buy MIRACO or EINSTAR VEGA?
Choose MIRACO when near and far capture with on-device review matters most. Choose EINSTAR VEGA when lighter standalone hd and wide-area capture is the priority.
Does the lower accuracy number guarantee a better scan?
No. Optical mode, object surface, tracking, calibration and scan technique can matter more than a best-case single-frame number.